Short-term reproductive outcomes analysis and prediction of the modified uterine stent treatment for mild to moderate intrauterine adhesions: experience at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of modified uterine stent in the treatment of mild-to-moderate intrauterine adhesions and explore the relative indicators affecting prognosis prediction. METHODS: A total of 115 patients with mild-to-moderate intrauterine adhesions received a modified uterine stent placement after hysteroscopy adhesiolysis. The second-look hysteroscopy operated after 3 months surgery, and the third-look hysteroscopy operated after 6 months surgery if necessary. The stent was removed when the cavity shape was repaired, then the reproductive outcomes were followed up one year. RESULTS: Menstrual blood volume, endometrial thickness and volume had increased significantly after 3 months surgery. The rates of cavity repaired were 86.96% (100/115) after 3 months surgery and 100% (115/115) after 6 months surgery cumulatively. Endometrial thickness after 3-months surgery was positively associated with uterine cavity shape repaired (P<0.01). The receive operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed the rate of uterine cavity shape repaired predicted by the model was 0.92, based on the endometrial thickness after 3-months surgery. The rate of pregnancy was 86.09% (99/115) in one year, while the rate of miscarriage accounted for 26.26% (26/99). The median time interval between stent removal and subsequent conception was 3 months. It showed adhesion recurrence was the risk factor for subsequent pregnancy (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A modified uterine stent placement under hysteroscopy was an effective approach for mild-to-moderate intrauterine adhesions, which is easy to operate and worthy for clinical promotion. Endometrial thickness measured by ultrasonography probably has predictive value in adhesion recurrence and subsequent pregnancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2100051524. Date of registration (retrospectively registered): 26/09/2021.

Comparing the efficacy and pregnancy outcome of intrauterine balloon and intrauterine contraceptive device in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in infertile women: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of intrauterine balloon and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the prevention of adhesion reformation following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in infertile women with moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial study. SETTING: A tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 130 patients with moderate (American Fertility Society [AFS] score of 5-8) and severe (AFS score of 9-12) intrauterine adhesions were recruited. INTERVENTIONS: 86 patients were evenly allocated to group treated with an IUD for 1 month and group treated with an IUD for 2 months. 44 patients were allocated to group treated with a Foley catheter balloon.(IUD: Yuangong IUD). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measures were the AFS score, endometrial thickness, and pregnancy outcome. After hysteroscopy, the AFS score was significantly decreased(P<0.05), whereas endometrial thickness was significantly increased across the three groups(P<0.001). Notably, the decline in the AFS score in the balloon group was greater than that in the IUD-1-month group and IUD-2-month group(P<0.01), with no significant difference between the IUD groups(P = 0.298). Lastly, In addition, the extent of the increase in endometrial thickness(P = 0.502) and the pregnancy outcomes(P = 0.803) in the three groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Inserting a balloon or placing an IUD for one or two months can effectively lower the risk of adhesion recurrence and restore the shape of the uterine cavity. While the therapeutic effect of the balloon was superior to that of the IUD, no significant differences were observed in the one-month and two-month IUD groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/enIndex.aspx ); Clinical trial registry identification number: ChiCTR-IOR-17,011,943 ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=17979 ). Date of trial registration: July 11, 2017.

Intrauterine interventions options for preventing recurrence after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Recurrence of adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is a challenging clinical problem without a unified management approach. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis that considered both direct and indirect comparisons between interventions to identify optimal strategies for preventing recurrence. METHODS: We searched for research trials published up to July 2023 from PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Database. We selected randomized controlled trials comparing the use of different interventions for the prevention of adhesion recurrence, with no language or regional restrictions. We used random-effects models to assess odds ratios (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Adverse events associated with the interventions were also assessed. This study was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42023449068. RESULTS: Data from 21 randomized controlled trials involving 2406 patients were synthesized, including interventions with balloon, amnion, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), intrauterine device (IUD), hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The top 5 interventions for change in AFS scores were: PRP + Balloon (MD = 5.44; 95% CI, 2.63-8.25), Amnion + Balloon (MD = 5.08; 95% CI, 2.71-7.44), IUD + Balloon (MD = 4.89; 95% CI, 2.49-7.30), HA + Balloon (MD = 3.80; 95% CI, 1.78-5.82), and G-CSF + Balloon (MD = 3.84; 95% CI, 1.05-6.63). There were no statistically significant differences between interventions in the recurrence rate of moderate-to-severe uterine adhesions and the clinical pregnancy rate. Most interventions were safe. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive network meta-analysis to date of interventions for preventing postoperative intrauterine adhesion recurrence. Our results indicate that PRP + Balloon seems to be the most effective approach.

Manually driven versus motor driven hysteroscopic tissue removal system for polypectomy: Long-term results.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this follow-up study is to compare a manually driven hysteroscopic tissue removal system (ResectrTM 9 Fr) with a motor driven system (TruclearTM) in terms of long-term clinical outcomes such as abnormal uterine bleeding and polyp recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: This is a follow-up of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing a manually and motor driven hysteroscopic tissue removal system for polypectomy. This prospective cohort study was performed at Ghent University Hospital (Ghent, Belgium) and Catharina Hospital Eindhoven (Eindhoven, the Netherlands). The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Trial ID = NCT05337605, April 2022). Seventy-five women with abnormal uterine bleeding who participated in the randomized controlled trial and had pathological confirmation of the diagnosis of an endometrial polyp, were contacted. Fifty-five women (70.67 %) were willing to participate in this follow-up study. The primary outcome was the recurrence and/or persistence of abnormal uterine bleeding and the time to the recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding. Secondary outcomes were polyp recurrence and time to polyp recurrence, symptom relief, satisfaction score regarding symptom relief and general satisfaction score regarding the surgical procedure. RESULTS: In the manually driven group, the mean time to the recurrence or persistence of abnormal uterine bleeding was 26 months (95 % CI 20 - 32). In the motor driven group, the mean time to the recurrence or persistence of abnormal uterine bleeding was 29 months (95 % CI 23- 34). A log-rank test showed a non-significant difference between both groups (P =.77). There was no significant difference in polyp recurrence (P =.22) or symptom relief between the two groups (P =.67). Additionally, the groups did not differ in satisfaction scores regarding symptoms or polypectomy (P =.16 and P =.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: This long-term follow-up study showed no statistically significant difference in the recurrence and persistence of abnormal uterine bleeding between a manually and motor driven hysteroscopic tissue removal system for polypectomy.

Uterovesical fistula and its treatment in Sub-Saharan Africa.

AIM:  Aim of the study to summarize the current information on diagnostic and treatment options for uterovesical fistula as a consequence of iatrogenic complication. Methods: Literature review of available information on surgical treatment options for uterovesical fistula resulting from previous caesarean section and comparison with our own experience in the developing world. Conclusion: Uterovesical fistula is an abnormal communication between the bladder and uterus. The cause of this pathology in most cases is an iatrogenic complication, most commonly arising after a caesarean section. The incidence of this pathology varies significantly geographically. In developed countries, these fistulas are rather rare. On the other hand, in developing countries, uterovesical fistulas are more common with a significant impact on the subsequent life of the patient due to generally inaccessible health care.

Intrauterine adhesion in ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) versus electric vacuum aspiration (EVA): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) can arise as a potential complication following uterine surgery, as the surgical procedure may damage the endometrial stratum basalis. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the occurrence of IUA in women who underwent ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) versus electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) for managing first-trimester miscarriage. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. Chinese women aged 18 years and above who had a delayed or incomplete miscarriage of ≤ 12 weeks of gestation were recruited in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the Prince of Wales. Recruited participants received either USG-MVA or EVA for the management of their miscarriage and were invited for a hysteroscopic assessment to evaluate the incidence of IUA between 6 and 20 weeks after the surgery. Patients were contacted by phone at 6 months to assess their menstrual and reproductive outcomes. RESULTS: 303 patients underwent USG-MVA or EVA, of whom 152 were randomised to 'USG-MVA' and 151 patients to the 'EVA' group. Out of the USG-MVA group, 126 patients returned and completed the hysteroscopic assessment, while in the EVA group, 125 patients did the same. The incidence of intrauterine adhesion (IUA) was 19.0% (24/126) in the USG-MVA group and 32.0% (40/125) in the EVA group, showing a significant difference (p < 0.02) between the two groups. No significant difference in the menstrual outcomes at 6 months postoperatively between the two groups but more patients had miscarriages in the EVA group with IUA. CONCLUSIONS: IUAs are a possible complication of USG-MVA. However, USG-MVA is associated with a lower incidence of IUA postoperatively at 6-20 weeks. USG-MVA is a feasible, effective, and safe alternative surgical treatment with less IUA for the management of first-trimester miscarriage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the Centre for Clinical Research and Biostatics- Clinical Trials Registry (CCRBCTR), which is a partner registry of the WHO Primary Registry-Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR) (Unique Trial Number: ChiCTR1900023198 with the first trial registration date on 16/05/2019).

The predictive value of serum IL-17A and IL-6 expression in postoperative recurrence in patients with intrauterine adhesion.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence rate of intrauterine adhesions (IUA) was high. At present, there are few studies on the relationship between proinflammatory factors IL-17A and IL-6 and IUA. The expression of serum IL-17A and IL-6 in IUA patients and their predictive value for postoperative recurrence were retrospectively analyzed. METHODS: A total of 90 IUA patients who underwent hysteroscopic adhesion lysis in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2023 were selected as the IUA group. Patients were divided into mild, moderate, and severe IUA groups. At the same time, 60 cases of secondary infertility patients with normal endometrium were selected as the control group. The clinical baseline characteristics and serum levels of IL-17A and IL-6 were compared between control group and IUA group. To analyze the correlation and predictive value of IL-17A and IL-6 expression levels with the recurrence rate of IUA patients. RESULTS: The preoperative levels of IL-17A and IL-6 in the IUA group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The higher the levels of inflammatory factors IL-17A and IL-6, the deeper the degree of IUA. Multivariate analysis showed that pregnancy, curettage history, IL-17A, and IL-6 levels were risk factors for IUA recurrence. In addition, the specificity and area under the curve of combining baseline data with postoperative serum IL-17A and IL-6 for predicting IUA were higher than those predicted separately. CONCLUSION: The expression levels of serum IL-17A and IL-6 can be used as a value index to evaluate postoperative recurrence in IUA patients.

Hysteroscopic Lysis of Complex Uterine Adhesions After Interventional Radiology-Guided Access.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a novel surgical technique using hysteroscopic lysis of adhesions after interventional radiology (IR)-guided access in patients with severe intrauterine adhesions and challenging uterine access. DESIGN: This video illustrates the technique of the safe division of intrauterine adhesions after IR-guided access. SETTING: Conventional hysteroscopic adhesiolysis might be inadequate or risky in cases of severely narrowed or obstructed uterine flow tract, possibly resulting in incomplete adhesiolysis, false passages, or uterine perforation. This video presents 2 cases from a tertiary center involving a multidisciplinary team of a reproductive surgeon and an interventional radiologist. The first case involves a 38-year-old with severe Asherman syndrome, who experienced unsuccessful attempt to treat adhesions that was complicated by a false passage. The second case involves a 39-year-old with recurrent severe Asherman syndrome and a history of unsuccessful attempts at hysterosalpingogram and conventional hysteroscopic lysis of adhesions. INTERVENTIONS: In the IR suite, the patient was put in a lithotomy position on the fluoroscopy table. A vaginal speculum was inserted exposing the cervix. The procedure was performed using intravenous sedation and topical anesthetic spray applied to the cervix. Using fluoroscopy, a balloon cannula was inserted through the cervix, followed by contrast injection to assess uterine access. If there is no route, transvaginal ultrasound-guided needle cannulation of the main portion of the uterine cavity would be performed, approximating as closely as possible to the expected route of the cervical canal. A guidewire followed by a locked loop catheter was advanced through adhesions into the uterine cavity. The catheter was left protruding from the cervix to guide the hysteroscope. The patient was then transferred to the operating room for the hysteroscopic procedure. Under the guidance of the intrauterine catheter, the adhesions were carefully lysed using cold scissors. The endometrial cavity and tubal openings were inspected to ensure complete adhesiolysis and exclusion of any other copathologies. CONCLUSION: IR guidance can provide a safe and effective approach to hysteroscopic lysis of adhesions in patients with challenging intrauterine adhesions and difficult uterine access, such as patients with severe Asherman syndrome, intractable cervical stenosis, uterine wall agglutination, previous adhesiolysis failure, marked fixed retroverted retroflexed uteri, and previous false passage or uterine perforation.

Diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis: a rare discovery.

PURPOSE: This case report aims to present a rare and challenging clinical scenario involving diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis (DUL), an infrequently encountered benign uterine pathology. The primary objective is to describe this unique case's clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and subsequent management. METHODS: A detailed analysis of the patient's medical history, diagnostic evaluations, and treatment approach was conducted. A relevant literature review on DUL was also performed. This case report includes high-resolution images and figures, showcasing MRI scans, surgical procedures, and histopathology slides related to the case. RESULTS: The case report outlines the clinical journey of a patient with DUL, an exceptionally rare uterine condition characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of smooth muscle cells forming nodules and fascicles. This case illustrates the diagnostic complexities associated with DUL, as it mimics other uterine pathologies such as leiomyomas or adenomyosis. The patient's clinical presentation included abnormal uterine bleeding, heavy menstrual bleeding, fertility issues, and dysmenorrhea, leading to initial misdiagnoses. Surgical intervention eventually addressed the condition with corresponding images illustrating the procedures. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights DUL's rarity and diagnostic challenges. Clinicians must be vigilant when encountering similar clinical presentations, ensuring a comprehensive diagnostic workup to differentiate DUL from other uterine pathologies. Enhanced awareness among healthcare providers and further research into DUL's pathophysiology is essential for accurate diagnosis and timely management. The presented case underscores the need for tailored approaches to managing DUL and expanding the knowledge base surrounding this puzzling uterine disorder.

Hysteroscopy-assisted suction curettage for early pregnancy loss: does it reduce retained products of conception and postoperative intrauterine adhesions?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the feasibility of hysteroscopy-assisted suction curettage for early pregnancy loss and to investigate whether it reduces the rates of retained products of conception (RPOC) and intrauterine adhesions (IUA). DESIGN: Prospective single-arm cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. PATIENTS: Women admitted for surgical evacuation of early pregnancy loss were invited to participate in the study. INTERVENTION: Vaginal misoprostol was administered for cervical ripening preoperatively. Under general anesthesia, a diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed to identify the pregnancy's implantation wall, followed by ultrasound-guided suction and curettage directed to the implantation wall, and then diagnostic hysteroscopy to verify complete uterine cavity emptying. Postoperative IUA were evaluated by follow-up office hysteroscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Identification of the pregnancy's implantation wall on hysteroscopy, and intra-, and postoperative complications associated with the procedure. The evaluation of postoperative IUA was limited due to the COVID-19 pandemic-related restrictions on elective procedures. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the study group. Their mean age was 34.0 ± 6.6 years, and their mean gestational age was 8.9 ± 1.6 weeks. The implantation wall was clearly visualized on hysteroscopy in 33 out of 40 cases (82.5%). The mean operative time was 17.2 ± 8.8 min, and no intraoperative complications occurred. Suspected RPOC were diagnosed intraoperatively by hysteroscopy and removed in 4 cases, and the histologic examination confirmed the presence of RPOC in three of them. Follow-up office hysteroscopy was performed in nine women: mild IUA was diagnosed in one case and a normal cavity was confirmed in eight cases. A new pregnancy was reported at the time of follow-up in 15 cases, while 12 women declined to attend the follow-up hysteroscopy and four were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopy-assisted suction curettage for early pregnancy loss is a safe, short, and inexpensive procedure, which allows the identification of the pregnancy's wall in most cases and may reduce the rates of RPOC.

Comparative outcomes between transvaginal endoscopic hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with benign uterine disease: A single-center, retrospective, cohort, interrupted time-series study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and transvaginal endoscopic hysterectomy (TVEH) for benign uterine diseases. METHODS: This retrospective, cohort, interrupted time-series study included patients who underwent TLH between January 2013 and September 2016 and TVEH between October 2016 and June 2020. Median difference regression was used to compare the hospital length of stay (LOS) and operative time between the groups. Risk difference regression was used to analyze the proportion of patients who developed postoperative fever or vaginal stump infection. RESULTS: Of the total 171 patients enrolled, 101 and 70 underwent TVEH and TLH, respectively. The mean ages of patients in the TVEH and TLH groups were 46.49 and 46.17 years, respectively. No conversion was observed. Ureteric injury occurred in one patient in the TVEH group, whereas there was no organ injury in any of the patients in the TLH group. Compared with those in the TLH group, patients in the TVEH group had a significantly shorter median operative time, shorter hospital LOS, lower morphine use, and lower postoperative febrile morbidity rates. However, no significant difference was observed in the rate of vaginal stump infection between the groups. CONCLUSION: Given the shorter operative time, shorter hospital LOS, less febrile morbidity, and lower morphine use in patients with TVEH than in those with TLH, TVEH should be considered as an alternative hysterectomy procedure for benign uterine diseases.

Incidence of intrauterine adhesion after ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) for first-trimester miscarriages: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) is a feasible and effective outpatient treatment to treat early pregnancy loss. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study at a university-affiliated hospital. All women undergoing either a USG-MVA or electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) were invited to return 3-6 months later for follow-up at which women completed a questionnaire to document their post-evacuation menstrual and reproductive history, and underwent a hysteroscopy if they were not pregnant. The severity of intrauterine adhesion (IUA), if present, was graded (Stage I-III) according to the American fertility society classification. RESULTS: A total of 292 women had a hysteroscopy after their initial surgical evacuation, USG-MVA 169(57.9%) versus EVA 123(42.1%). Women undergoing EVA as opposed to a USG-MVA had a 12.9% higher incidence of IUA (24.1% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.042) equivalent to 1.84 times higher risk (95% CI 1.01-3.34; p = 0.048). Women having EVA continued to show an increased but not statistically significant trend towards an increased risk of IUA after adjusting for the type of miscarriage (aOR = 1.3; 95% CI 0.66-2.50; p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in their reproductive outcomes and fewer women post-USG-MVA complained of hypomenorrhea. IUA may still occur in women undergoing USG-MVA but it is lower than the rate in women undergoing EVA. Clinical trials registry The trial was registered with the Centre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics - Clinical Trials Registry (CCRBCTR), a partner registry of the WHO Primary Registry-Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR) with a Unique Trial Number: CUHK_CCRB00541 on 22 Dec 2016.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of intrauterine spacers used to prevent the formation of intrauterine adhesions following endometrial cavity surgery.

AIM: To assess, from a United States (US) payer's perspective, the cost-effectiveness of gels designed to separate the endometrial surfaces (intrauterine spacers) placed following intrauterine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of intrauterine spacers used to facilitate endometrial repair and prevent the formation (primary prevention) and reformation (secondary prevention) of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) and associated pregnancy- and birth-related adverse outcomes. Event rates and costs were extrapolated from data available in the existing literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to corroborate the base case results. RESULTS: In this model, using intrauterine spacers for adhesion prevention led to net cost savings for US payers of $2,905 per patient over a 3.5-year time horizon. These savings were driven by the direct benefit of preventing procedures associated with IUA formation ($2,162 net savings) and the indirect benefit of preventing pregnancy-related complications often associated with IUA formation ($3,002). These factors offset the incremental cost of intrauterine spacer use of $1,539 based on an assumed price of $1,800 and the related increase in normal deliveries of $931. Model outcomes were sensitive to the probability of preterm and normal deliveries. Budget impact analyses show overall cost savings of $19.96 per initial member within a US healthcare plan, translating to $20 million over a 5-year time horizon for a one-million-member plan. LIMITATIONS: There are no available data on the effects of intrauterine spacers or IUAs on patients' quality of life. Resultingly, the model could not evaluate patients' utility related to treatment with or without intrauterine spacers and instead focused on costs and events avoided. CONCLUSION: This analysis robustly demonstrated that intrauterine spacers would be cost-saving to healthcare payers, including both per-patient and per-plan member, through a reduction in IUAs and improvements to patients' pregnancy-related outcomes.

Every year, women in the United States (US) undergo surgery to treat intrauterine abnormalities to maintain or improve the uterus' ability to support fetal development and result in a term delivery. Despite the benefits of these procedures, damage caused to the endometrium (uterine lining) is associated with a risk of adherence of the endometrial cavity surfaces with scar tissue known as intrauterine adhesions (IUAs).Damage to the endometrium and the resulting IUAs may be associated with infertility, light or absent menstruation, pregnancy loss, and other pregnancy-related complications. Treating these conditions within the US healthcare system consumes resources and adds costs for healthcare payers (public and private insurance providers).To facilitate endometrial repair and to reduce or prevent IUAs, researchers have developed materials to place within the endometrial cavity following surgery to separate the endometrial surfaces during the early healing period. These intrauterine "spacers" are intended to improve patients' subsequent clinical outcomes and save money for healthcare payers. It is unknown whether these improved clinical outcomes offset the cost of the routine use of spacers following "at-risk" procedures that involve the endometrial cavity.We developed a model designed to determine the cost-effectiveness of an intrauterine spacer by quantifying improvements in clinical outcomes and the resultant cost savings for patients undergoing uterine surgeries with or without spacers. Our model predicted that routinely using such spacers following at-risk procedures would improve patient outcomes and reduce costs to US payers.

Value and influencing factors of preoperative MRI evaluation for previous cesarean scar defect associated abnormal uterine bleeding in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. / æœ¯å‰ç£å ±æŒ¯è¯„ä»·è ¹è ”é•œæ‰‹æœ¯æ²»ç–—å‰–å®«äº§åˆ‡å£ç˜¢ç—•ç¼ºé™·ç›¸å ³å¼‚å¸¸å­å®«å‡ºè¡€çš„ä»·å€¼åŠå½±å“å› ç´ ï¼ˆè‹±æ–‡ï¼‰.

OBJECTIVES: As the cesarean section rate increases year by year, the treatment of previous cesarean scar defects (PCSD) poses a significant challenge. This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology and analyze relevant influencing factors for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) associated with cesarean scar defects who underwent laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for PCSD-related AUB at the Department of Gynecology, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from 2018 to 2022. A total of 57 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of AUB associated with PCSD were divided into 2 groups based on their postoperative clinical cure status: The clinically-cured group (n=28, 49.1%) and the non-clinically-cured group (n=29, 50.9%). After a postoperative follow-up period of 3 months for all participants, logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the correlation between the clinical cure rate of AUB associated with cesarean scar defects treated by laparoscopic surgery and various factors. These factors included patient age, clinical symptoms, obstetric history, history of cesarean section, basic clinical information, preoperative MRI parameters, and postoperative menstrual conditions. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in many aspects, including the patient's age at the time of previous cesarean section, number of pregnancy, time since the previous cesarean section, the uterus position assessed by preoperative T2 signal MRI, defect length, defect width, residual muscle layer thickness, adjacent uterine muscle layer thickness, and distance from the defect to the external cervical os between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). However, the time of onset of AUB symptoms (P=0.036, OR=1.019, 95% CI 1.002 to 1.038) and the depth of the defect on the preoperative MRI (P=0.010, OR=5.793, 95% CI 1.635 to 25.210) were identified as risk factors affecting the clinical cure rate. CONCLUSIONS: The time of onset of AUB symptoms and the depth of the defect on preoperative MRI are risk factors that influence the clinical cure rate of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of AUB associated with PCSD, which could be helpful for evaluating the prognosis of disease.

Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: A relationship between endometrial polypectomy and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes has been reported; however, only a few studies have compared polyp removal techniques and pregnancy rates. We investigated whether different polypectomy techniques with endometrial curettage and hysteroscopic polypectomy for endometrial polyps affect subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Data from 434 patients who had undergone polypectomy for suspected endometrial polyps using transvaginal ultrasonography before embryo transfer in IVF at four institutions between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, there were 157 and 277 patients in the hysteroscopic (mean age: 35.0 years) and curettage (mean age: 37.3 years) groups, respectively. Single-blastocyst transfer cases were selected from both groups and age-matched to unify background factors. Results: In the single-blastocyst transfer cases, 148 (mean age: 35.0 years) and 196 (mean age: 35.9 years) were in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, with the 148 cases matched by age. In these cases, the pregnancy rates for the first embryo transfer were 68.2% (odds ratio (OR): 2.14) and 51.4% (OR: 1.06) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively; the resulting OR was 2.03. The pregnancy rates after up to the second transfer were 80.4% (OR: 4.10) and 68.2% (OR: 2.14) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the OR was 1.91. The live birth rates were 66.2% (OR: 1.956) and 53.4% (OR: 1.15) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the odds ratio was 1.71. These results show the effectiveness of hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy compared to polypectomy with endometrial curettage. No significant difference was found regarding the miscarriage rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy resulted in a higher pregnancy rate in subsequent embryo transfer than polypectomy with endometrial curettage. Therefore, establishing a facility where polypectomy can be performed hysteroscopically is crucial.

Comparing endometrial biopsy results with hysteroscopic pathology in women presenting with abnormal and postmenopausal uterine bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pathology results after office-based blind endometrial biopsy and pathology results from hysteroscopy in women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of biologic women presenting with AUB at a tertiary care referral care center. Patients were included if they underwent evaluation with blind endometrial biopsy performed in the office followed by hysteroscopy within one year. Hysteroscopic findings and pathology were correlated with index endometrial biopsy findings. RESULTS: 689 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age and BMI were 49 (±10) years and 31 (±8) kg/m2. The median duration of bleeding leading up to presentation was of 3.5 (1.5-9) months. Of the patients who had operative hysteroscopic pathology demonstrating endometrial polyp, 30.6 % (81) had a polyp detected on office endometrial biopsy. Of the patients who had hysteroscopic pathology demonstrating intracavitary fibroids, 0 % (0) were detected on endometrial biopsy. Of the patients who had hyperplasia without atypia on hysteroscopy, 28.6 % (4) were detected or suspected on endometrial biopsy. Of the patients who had hyperplasia with atypia on hysteroscopy, 5.9 % (1) were detected or suspected on endometrial biopsy. There were 12 cases of confirmed or suspected malignancy on hysteroscopy, of which 8.3 % (1) were detected on endometrial biopsy. CONCLUSION: Concordance between focal findings on office hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy is low. Endometrial biopsy when malignancy is suspected has been shown to be of benefit, but in the setting of suspected benign focal pathology, blind assessment of the endometrial cavity for definitive diagnosis should be abandoned. In women with symptomatic uterine bleeding, hysteroscopic visualization is associated with increased sensitivity in identifying intrauterine pathology.

Case report: septic shock after endometrial polypectomy with tissue removal system.

As an emerging surgical technology, tissue removal systems have been widely used in the treatment of endometrial polyps due to its characteristics of less endometrial damage, shorter learning curve and clearer vision of the operative field. There are few cases in the literature reporting serious complications after endometrial polypectomy using tissue removal systems. As known, septic shock is a rare complication following hysteroscopic polypectomy. Now, we present the case of a 23-year-old woman who developed septic shock after polypectomy with tissue removal system. The patient had a history of recurrent vaginitis for more than half a year. Due to endometrial polyps, she was admitted to our hospital and scheduled to undergo hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy. Three hours after the endometrial polypectomy using the tissue removal system, the patient had shock symptoms such as increased body temperature, decreased blood pressure and increased heart rate. Then, the patient was successfully treated and discharged after anti-infection and anti-shock treatments. The purpose of this case report is to remind clinicians to consider the possibility of serious infection and comprehensively evaluate the risk of infection before choosing hysteroscopic devices for endometrial polyps, especially for patients who choose the mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal systems. Furthermore, the mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal systems should be used with caution in patients with previous recurrent vaginitis.

Adjuvants to prevent reformation of adhesions following adhesiolysis for Asherman syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Two international guidelines published on the management of Asherman syndrome (AS) have made recommendations on various adjuvant methods to prevent intrauterine reformation. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of these methods when used in primary or secondary prevention settings is different. Our aim is to assess the effectiveness of various adjuvant methods for the secondary prevention of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). Articles were considered eligible if they included subjects with AS before surgery and compared a chosen method with either a control or a comparison group (using another method). The primary outcome was the IUA reformation rate at follow-up hysteroscopy. A total of 29 studies [15 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 cohort studies] were included. Adhesion reformation with various methods to prevented IUA reformation when compared with controls were: second-look hysteroscopy: [risk ratio (RR): 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.90 (p = 0.02)]; intrauterine contraceptive device: RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.36-1.12 (p = 0.12); continuous intrauterine balloon: RR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05-0.68 (p = 0.01); intermittent intrauterine balloon: RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.80 (p = 0.004); anti-adhesion gel: RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.58-1.10 (p = 0.17); amnion graft: RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.91 (p = 0.01).

Rare cause of abdominal pain in the third trimester: uterine torsion.

The occurrence of uterine torsion is rare, as the uterus is supported in place by the uterine ligaments. When occurring during pregnancy, it is associated with increased perinatal mortality and maternal morbidity. We report a case of uterine torsion in a 36-week pregnant woman with a history of one previous caesarean section who presented with acute abdominal pain and signs of fetal distress. A 180 degree uterine torsion was recognised during emergency caesarean section with detorsion done prior to delivery and the baby was delivered in good condition. This case highlights the importance of prompt recognition and decision-making in managing this rare obstetric emergency to achieve a successful maternal and foetal outcome.